Case Studies & Service Examples

Explore how technical SEO, content, external sources and brand knowledge management support SEO and GEO work across industries.

Find your industry

This page includes 7 customer case studies and 13 illustrative service examples. The examples explain our approach; their scope, workloads and business metrics are hypothetical and do not represent achieved customer results.

Consumer electronics and office accessories · Service example

Use device and protocol tests to help buyers identify compatible models

A docking-station and charging-accessory brand selling through its website, retail platforms and authorized merchants.

Figures in this service example illustrate measurement methods. They do not represent actual customer results.

Illustrative metric · Monthly AI-referred net sales

~US$9,600

Complete month of Apr 2026, up US$6,400 from Sep 2025. Includes identifiable AI-referred orders after cancellations and refunds.

Laptops and office equipment
Industry illustration; not a customer location or product.

GEO project scope

Target markets
United StatesUnited KingdomGermany

English / German

Service period
Oct 2025–Apr 2026
Reference observation window
About 3 weeks
Illustrative AI platforms and search experiences
ChatGPTGoogle AI ModeAmazon Alexa

In this example, Amazon Alexa focuses on US shopping experiences, with ChatGPT and Google prioritized in the United Kingdom and Germany.

Monitoring scope
8 topics · 96 distinct prompts

Focused on unbranded research and purchase intent

Illustrative GEO monitoring metrics

Hypothetical comparison: before → after

AI visibility

10%23%

+13 percentage points

Share of monitored answers mentioning the target brand or a priority model

Brand website citation rate

4.3%12.6%

+8.3 percentage points

Share of monitored answers citing the brand website

Top-three recommendation rate

3.8%14.1%

+10.3 percentage points

Share of monitored answers placing the brand among the top three recommendations

Increase in monthly AI-referred net sales
+$6,400

Sep 2025 → Apr 2026, using complete months. Attribution changes do not establish causal incremental sales.

Illustrative shopping monitoring metrics

Share of answers placing priority SKUs in the top three
14% → 32%

The denominator includes answers where the product does not appear

Share of shopping answers listing the brand website as a merchant
9% → 24%

Measured among shopping answers returning merchant information

Model and compatibility information accuracy
81% → 96%

Manually checked against product specifications and test evidence

Typical challenges

On-site · Technical SEO

Model, bundle and compatibility pages need restructuring, with weak migration controls for legacy URLs, variant canonical tags and product events.

On-site · Content coverage

Product pages lack compatibility evidence and selection criteria. Identifiers, pricing, inventory and feed information are inconsistent with landing pages.

Off-site · Sources and consistency

Outdated reviews still recommend discontinued models, while compatibility feedback and competitor pricing do not feed into routine updates.

Brand knowledge management

Test conditions, protocols, supported devices and discontinuation relationships lack a consistent version for pages, feeds and support teams.

Optimization approach

Improve model architecture, product pages and feeds, then use compatibility feedback and competitor monitoring to refine selection content. Review identifiable AI-referred net sales and model errors.

Illustrative service plan

These modules illustrate how a service plan can be assembled. Actual workloads and delivery schedules depend on the agreed project scope.

On-site · Site development and architecture migration

Rebuild model and compatibility selection architecture

Map legacy models, bundles and variant URLs, including redirects, canonical tags and internal links. Connect device selection, product pages and purchase events.

Illustrative workloadMonth 1: one model architecture and migration plan, with launch checks for 30 priority URLs

On-site · Content optimization

Use compatibility evidence in product pages

Specify devices, operating systems, interfaces, display outputs and power requirements. Clarify variant differences, warranties and returns, supported by comparisons and FAQs.

Illustrative workloadMonthly: 10 product or compatibility page plans and 12 buying guides

Product data · Feed optimization

Manage SKU, variant and shopping data

Check identifiers, model numbers, bundles, pricing, stock and images. Align Merchant Center feeds, page markup and current listings, tracking issues by channel.

Illustrative workloadMonthly: 30 SKU or variant checks and 2 feed diagnostics

Off-site · Sources and consistency

Update reviews and authorized retail information

Provide priority reviewers, retailers and technical forums with compatibility and replacement information. Track corrections, current products and merchant listings.

Illustrative workload20 priority sources; follow up with 8 each month

Brand knowledge management

Maintain compatibility and model facts

Standardize test conditions, supported devices, model aliases, variants and discontinuation relationships for content, support and outreach.

Illustrative workloadMonth 1: one knowledge library; maintain 20 compatibility or model records each month

Customer sentiment monitoring

Identify compatibility and after-sales issues

Monitor agreed retail reviews and public Reddit, X and Facebook discussions. Route compatibility misunderstandings, quality feedback and service complaints to the relevant teams.

Illustrative workloadWeekly sentiment summary, with recurring questions added to FAQs and support information

Competitor monitoring

Compare device use cases and product competition

Monitor competitor models, recommendation reasons, merchants, prices and compatibility claims in target AI experiences. Update pages when new devices or promotions affect selection.

Illustrative workload5 competing brands and 15 priority SKUs; weekly comparison review

Reddit / X / Facebook / YouTube

Extend content through compatibility answers and demonstrations

Join relevant device discussions with verifiable compatibility information. Evaluate helpful posts and demonstrations rather than backlink or posting volume.

Illustrative workloadMonthly: 12 social posts, 8 responses and 2 compatibility demo videos

Project responsibilities
Dageno team
SEO/GEO diagnostics, technical and content planning, source development, outreach, weekly progress updates and monthly reviews.
Client and collaborators
Engineers run compatibility tests, product teams maintain identifiers and listings, and channel teams work with merchants.
Delivery and channel records
Track planning, production, launch, media outreach and publication separately. Count original content separately from adaptations for other platforms.
Metric definitions and measurement

AI visibility, brand website citation rate and top-three recommendation rate use different definitions. Comparisons use the same agreed prompts, platforms and markets; these metrics do not represent user search volume or market share.

Repeat monitoring using the agreed markets, languages and sampling method. Record citations and recommendations separately for each platform.

Complete month of Apr 2026, up US$6,400 from Sep 2025. Includes identifiable AI-referred orders after cancellations and refunds.

Illustrative measurement sources: Dageno shopping answers, compatibility tests, GA4 and Shopify. Compare complete months in Sep 2025 and Apr 2026.

Semrush search traffic trend

What should your business work on next?

Bring your brand, target markets and current challenges. We can help you choose diagnostic support, focused execution or ongoing managed services.

Explore service options